institutional-inertia
Filtering by topic institutional-inertia(1)Clear all filters
- PaperEdArXiv (OSF Preprints)20 Jul 2026
Knowing Better, Staying Put: Bilateral Evidence of Status Quo Bias as the Primary Barrier to Educational Transformation
MAYYADAH MUHYE ALDEEN SAYYED ABUELOLA
A mixed-methods study (N=200) found that both students and teachers acknowledge their educational system is failing but remain due to status quo bias and loss aversion, not ideological support. The majority expressed ambivalence rather than resistance, suggesting change efforts should focus on making transitions safe and visible rather than arguing for change.
Original abstract
This paper reports a mixed-methods study (N = 200; 100 secondary students, 100 teachers; 80 qualitative interviews) examining why both students and teachers remain in educational systems they independently acknowledge are failing them — a pattern consistent with status quo bias and loss aversion operating at the institutional level. One-sample tests against the scale midpoint confirm that both populations score significantly below the neutral point on engagement, creativity, and autonomy (all p < .001), while both project significantly above-midpoint effectiveness under redesigned conditions — producing a statistically significant projected capacity gap (students: t(99) = 4.72, p < .001; teachers: t(99) = 7.91, p < .001). Qualitative coding achieved good inter-rater reliability (κ = .74) and found zero defenders of the traditional system across 80 interviews. The qualitative data suggest that fear rather than conviction sustains institutional inertia — 46% of students and 33% of teachers expressed ambivalence rather than outright resistance, a finding with direct implications for implementation strategy: if the dominant orientation is ambivalence rather than resistance, change agents should invest in making transition visible and safe rather than constructing arguments for why change is necessary. These findings reframe the educational change problem: the barrier to transformation is not ideological conviction in favour of the traditional system but a well-documented psychological preference for the known over the unknown, with direct implications for how educational change theory should approach implementation.