ai-in-language-teaching
Filtering by topic ai-in-language-teaching(5)Clear all filters
- PaperOpenAlex — TESOL research22 Jul 2026
ENHANCING FOREIGN LANGUAGE TEACHING METHODOLOGY THROUGH ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE: A CASE STUDY OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNING
Farmonova Naimakhon Furkat kizi
A mixed-method study evaluated AI-based tools—intelligent tutoring systems, natural language processing applications, and adaptive learning platforms—for English language teaching in higher education. Results showed significant improvements in vocabulary acquisition, communicative competence, and learner autonomy, though challenges in teacher readiness, infrastructure, and ethics remain.
Original abstract
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is rapidly transforming educational practices, particularly in the field of foreign language teaching. This study explores how AI can enhance English language teaching methodology in higher education. Using a mixed-method research design, the study evaluates the impact of AI-based tools such as intelligent tutoring systems, natural language processing applications, and adaptive learning platforms on students’ language proficiency. The findings reveal that AI significantly improves vocabulary acquisition, communicative competence, and learner autonomy. However, challenges related to teacher readiness, infrastructure, and ethical considerations remain. The study contributes to the development of modern AI-based pedagogical frameworks.
- PaperComputer Assisted Language Learning11 Jun 2026
The impact of GenAI chatbots on communicative competence in EFL writing in Chinese upper secondary school
Zhoutiao Li
This study examines how generative AI chatbots affect communicative competence in EFL writing among Chinese upper secondary school students.
- PaperLanguage Teaching20 May 2026
When AI speaks too loudly: Rethinking English learning in China’s English language centre
Dan Zhou
The role of AI in English language learning at a Chinese language centre is reexamined, arguing that AI may be too dominant or intrusive.
- PaperReCALL29 Dec 2025
Impact of prompt sophistication on ChatGPT’s output for automated written corrective feedback
Na Luo, Yifan Wang, Zhe (Victor) Zhang, Yile Zhou et al.
This study tested how prompt sophistication (generic, zero-shot, one-shot) affects ChatGPT's accuracy in automated written corrective feedback (AWCF), comparing it to Grammarly. Domain-specific prompts, especially one-shot, greatly improved error detection, surpassing Grammarly on frequent errors like word choice and sentence structure, though some limitations persisted.
Original abstract
The emergence of large language models, exemplified by ChatGPT, has garnered growing attention for their potential to generate feedback in second language writing, particularly automated written corrective feedback (AWCF). In this study, we examined how prompt design – a generic prompt and two domain-specific prompts (zero-shot and one-shot) enriched with comprehensive domain knowledge about written corrective feedback (WCF) – influences ChatGPT’s ability to provide AWCF. The accuracy and coverage of ChatGPT’s feedback across these three prompts were benchmarked against Grammarly, a widely used traditional automated writing evaluation (AWE) tool. We find that ChatGPT’s ability in flagging language errors grew considerably with prompt sophistication driven by the integration of domain-specific knowledge and examples. While the generic prompt resulted in substantially lower performance than Grammarly, the zero-shot prompt achieved comparable results to it and the one-shot prompt surpassed it considerably in error detection. Notably, the most pronounced improvement in ChatGPT’s performance was observed in its detection of frequent error categories, including those of word choice or expression, direct translation, sentence structure and pronoun. Nonetheless, even with the most sophisticated prompt, ChatGPT still displayed certain limitations when compared to Grammarly. Our study has both theoretical and practical implications. Theoretically, it lends empirical evidence to Knoth et al .’s (2024) proposition to separate domain-specific AI literacy from generic AI literacy. Practically, it sheds light on the pedagogical application and technical development of AWE systems.
- PaperReCALL1 Dec 2025
Examining the effectiveness of integrating corpus-based and AI approaches for English speaking practice
Hsueh Chu Chen, Xiaona Zhou, Jing Xuan Tian
An online English speaking training approach integrating a self-developed spoken corpus, generative AI, and text-to-speech tools was developed and evaluated. Pre- and post-tests showed improvements in speaking performance, with participants using more complex sentences and reducing vowel errors. The combination of corpus and AI tools provided accurate feedback and created an interactive learning environment.
Original abstract
This study developed and evaluated an online English speaking training approach that integrates corpora and artificial intelligence (AI) tools. The training integrated a self-developed spoken corpus, generative AI tools, and text-to-speech AI tools. Pre- and post-test results identified improvements in participants’ speaking performances. Participants attempted to use more positive linguistic features (e.g. producing complex sentences more frequently) and avoid using negative linguistic features (e.g. reducing the number of vowel errors) after receiving the training. Participants showed positive attitudes towards this corpus-based and AI-integrated English oral ability learning approach and affirmed the importance of integrating both tools. The corpus helped raise participants’ awareness of features that influence speaking performance and offered prompt engineering and feedback-checking functions, while the generative AI tools provided useful feedback and tailor-made sample responses. Additionally, text-to-speech AI tools offered learners with tailor-made native speaker samples for imitation and helped learners learn pausing. Results also revealed that this approach helped create an interactive oral ability learning environment, and the combination of corpora and AI tools provided more accurate feedback for each subskill of speaking.