chatbot-authenticity
Filtering by topic chatbot-authenticity(1)Clear all filters
- PaperLanguage Testing28 Jun 2026
Evaluating Chatbot Authenticity in Simulations of Spoken Interaction: Demonstrating The Utility of Corpus-Based Methods for Development and Validation
Dana Gablasova, Luke Harding, Vaclav Brezina, Emil T. Hazelhurst et al.
This study develops a corpus-based framework to evaluate the authenticity of chatbot simulated spoken interaction compared to natural human speech. Using a corpus of ChatGPT output and the British National Corpus, they found that chatbot production more closely resembles written than spoken language, with higher lexical density and fewer spoken features like stance markers. The framework is intended for use in developing and validating AI-powered conversational agents for language assessment.
Original abstract
This study presents a methodological framework for applying corpus linguistics to systematically evaluate the authenticity of chatbot production in relation to (spoken) production in a general target language use domain. We demonstrate the approach through data drawn from the development cycle of a low-stakes formative assessment system in which learners interact with a ChatGPT-powered bot. A Chatbot Corpus containing approx. 290,000 words from 600 simulations of target ChatGPT production was created, representing two GPT versions (3.5 and 4), and three temperature settings. This corpus was then compared with relevant subcorpora in the British National Corpus 2014, which contains 100 million words of British English collected in naturalistic settings. Analyses were conducted at macro- (multi-dimensional analysis), meso- (comparative frequency analysis), and micro-levels (occurrence of specific pragmatic feature analysis). Results showed that the ChatGPT-powered chatbot production was systematically more similar to genres of written rather than spoken communication: output demonstrated higher lexical density and was characterised by a relatively low occurrence of features typical of spoken communication such as stance and pragmatic markers. We argue that the methodological framework is applicable across different chatbot models, allowing researchers and developers to use this approach with newer, more refined AI-powered conversational agents in the future.