construct-validity
Filtering by topic construct-validity(2)Clear all filters
- PaperEdArXiv (OSF Preprints)17 Jul 2026
Human Readiness as the Missing Variable in AI Adoption in Education
Dr NIRMALA KRISHNAN
This paper positions the construct of Human Readiness for AI in Education against seven established technology adoption models, arguing that it offers a new organization-level perspective spanning dimensions not covered by existing accounts. It outlines discriminant-validity tests to empirically distinguish Human Readiness from related constructs. The paper contributes to theory development for AI implementation in schools.
Original abstract
A theoretical contribution to organizational scholarship requires more than the introduction of a new label for a familiar phenomenon; it requires showing what factors an existing account omits, how those factors relate to one another, and why the resulting explanation improves on what came before (Whetten, 1989). This paper undertakes that task for Human Readiness for AI in Education, a construct introduced in a companion paper (Krishnan, 2026a) as the primary determinant of whether artificial intelligence (AI) implementation benefits a school. Rather than introducing new theory, this paper positions Human Readiness systematically against seven established accounts of technology adoption and organizational change the Technology Acceptance Model, the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology, Diffusion of Innovations theory, Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge, the Substitution-Augmentation-Modification-Redefinition model, the Concerns-Based Adoption Model, and Weiner's theory of organizational readiness for change comparing each on level of analysis, outcome variable, core constructs, and explanatory scope. It argues that Human Readiness is not a relabeling of any single existing construct, but a candidate organization-level construct whose five proposed dimensions span territory these accounts divide across separate literatures. Because the value of that claim rests entirely on demonstrating that Human Readiness is empirically distinct from its nearest neighbors, the paper closes by specifying, using established construct-validation methodology (Cronbach & Meehl, 1955; Campbell & Fiske, 1959; Fornell & Larcker, 1981; MacKenzie, Podsakoff, & Podsakoff, 2011), the discriminant-validity tests the construct must pass and the outcome under which it should be judged redundant and retired. Keywords: human readiness; construct validity; technology acceptance; organizational readiness for change; discriminant validity; theory development
- PaperETS Research Report Series16 Jul 2026
Second Language Writing Processes in the TOEFL iBT® Test: Examining the Write for an Academic Discussion Task Using Eye-Tracking, Keystroke Logging, and Stimulated Recall
Ching-Ni Hsieh, Renka Ohta
Using eye-tracking, keystroke logging, and stimulated recall, the study examined L2 writing processes in the TOEFL iBT Write for an Academic Discussion task. The integrated data revealed five core cognitive processes—prompt (re)reading, planning, formulation, monitoring, and revision—and showed that task design influences strategic behaviors and attention allocation, supporting construct validity.
Original abstract
The present study investigates the construct validity of the TOEFL iBT® writing test and focuses on the writing processes elicited by the Write for an Academic Discussion (WAD) task. Nineteen adult L2 English users completed the WAD task while their eye movements and keystrokes were recorded, followed by stimulated recall interviews to capture their writing strategies and thought processes. Eye-tracking data revealed sustained attention to the writing window, with frequent reference to the task question and example posts. Keystroke logging indicated substantial initial pauses and language-related revision behaviors. Qualitative analysis of stimulated recalls identified five core cognitive processes: prompt (re)reading, planning, formulation, monitoring, and revision. The integration of eye-tracking, keystroke logging, and stimulated recall demonstrates that the WAD task engages L2 writers in processes consistent with theoretical models of academic writing, supplying backing for the construct validity of the TOEFL iBT Writing test. The findings also reveal that task design features may influence L2 writing processes and shape writers’ strategic behaviors and attention allocation. Suggested citation: Hsieh, C.-N., & Ohta, R. (in press). Second language writing processes in the TOEFL iBT® test: Examining the Write for an Academic Discussion task using eye-tracking, keystroke logging, and stimulated recall (Research Report). ETS. https://doi.org/10.64634/tk1sd682