pedagogical-translanguaging
Filtering by topic pedagogical-translanguaging(2)Clear all filters
- PaperTESOL Quarterly22 Jul 2026
Pedagogical Translanguaging in Motion: Multimodal Mediation in Preservice Teachers' Storytelling with Young English Learners
Sue Garton, Serdar Tekin
This study investigated how eight preservice English teachers in Turkish primary schools used translanguaging and multimodal strategies during storytelling lessons over eight weeks. Initially, teachers relied on shared linguistic repertoires to manage interaction and scaffold comprehension, but over time they shifted toward increased use of gesture, visuals, and realia while verbal translanguaging became more selective. The findings provide classroom-based evidence of how translanguaging practices evolve and offer implications for multilingual pedagogy and teacher education.
Original abstract
Amid growing interest in multilingual pedagogies, translanguaging has increasingly been positioned as a response to monolingual teaching norms. Yet empirical accounts of what pedagogical translanguaging looks like in everyday classrooms—particularly in teaching English to young learners—remain limited. At the same time, although storytelling occupies a central place in young learner pedagogy, little research has examined how teachers mobilize linguistic and semiotic resources during storytelling lessons. Addressing both gaps, this study draws on the pedagogical translanguaging framework and the Dynamic Model of Multilingualism to investigate the evolving practices of eight preservice English teachers (PSTs) in Turkish state primary schools. The data set comprises 32 video‐recorded storytelling lessons over 8 weeks and follow‐up in‐depth interviews. Findings show that PSTs initially drew on shared linguistic repertoires to manage classroom interaction and scaffold story comprehension. Over time, however, these practices shifted, and translanguaging use decreased as PSTs increasingly employed multimodal strategies, including gesture, visual supports, and realia. Findings suggest how teachers' mediational practices became increasingly adaptive, with verbal translanguaging becoming more selective alongside increased use of multimodal mediation. The study contributes classroom‐based evidence of how translanguaging evolves over time and offers implications for multilingual pedagogy and teacher education in young learner contexts.
- PaperLanguage Teaching29 Apr 2026
Pedagogical translanguaging in secondary EFL: A systematic review of practice and teacher development (2023–2025)
Yelena Zakharova, David Lasagabaster
A systematic review of 25 empirical studies from 2023–2025 identifies four interconnected themes in pedagogical translanguaging in secondary EFL: barriers to implementation, pedagogical rationales, classroom practices, and learning outcomes. The review reveals that translanguaging is pragmatically necessary but remains systematically unsupported at the institutional level, leading teachers to implement it covertly without formal preparation, and calls for recognizing translanguaging as professional expertise.
Original abstract
While pedagogical translanguaging (PT) has gained prominence as an approach for bridging learners’ multilingual repertoires and monolingual teaching paradigms, secondary English as a Foreign Language (EFL) contexts remain underexamined, particularly following recent shifts in classroom diversity. This systematic review synthesizes 25 empirical studies of PT in secondary EFL education published between January 2023 and August 2025. Based on Reflexive Thematic Analysis, four interconnected themes were identified: (1) barriers to PT implementation due to structural, ideological, and teacher preparation constraints within institutional environments; (2) pedagogical rationales that integrate cognitive, affective, and sociocultural justifications; (3) observable classroom practices organized by pedagogical function, revealing strategic deployment of more-enabled and less-enabled languages; and (4) learning outcomes across cognitive, affective, and sociocultural domains. These themes reveal a fundamental tension: although translanguaging proves pragmatically necessary for effective EFL teaching, it remains systematically unsupported at the institutional level. Teachers justify and enact sophisticated multilingual practices, but without formal preparation, they tend to implement PT covertly within unsupportive structures, relying on knowledge that remains tacit and difficult to share. The review shows that PT has outpaced institutional recognition, calling for systems that treat it as professional expertise rather than tolerated improvisation.